Difference between revisions of "Talk:Indiana Pwns"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Neither hack is "better". They both perform the '''exact same function'''.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | :Neither hack is "better". They both perform the '''exact same function'''.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
::No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. [[User:OrAreWeDancers|OrAreWeDancers]] 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | ::No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. [[User:OrAreWeDancers|OrAreWeDancers]] 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | + | ::::I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
| − | |||
Revision as of 02:31, 26 September 2009
And here it is. The new Twilight Hack. :) Still not quite as good as Bannerbomb, though, in my opinion. Sorry, guys.--OMIGHTY1 20:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Neither hack is "better". They both perform the exact same function.--Arikado 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. OrAreWeDancers 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --SifJar 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. OrAreWeDancers 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
