Talk:Savegame Extractor: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Pokemon Ranch thoughts == | |||
Before I do this I wanted some professional advice. In My Pokemon Ranch it takes 999 Pokemon to get a Mew. 999 Pkmn is nucking futs. SO I was thinking about using Save Extractor to rip the save- Take my Pokemon back, Delete the save, and install the ripped save. In theory- all my pokemon I HAD stored, should still be there, and can re-upload the ones on my DS. Double my farm. Will this work? --[[User:Sin|Sin]] 02:37, 9 August 2008 (CEST) | |||
== == | |||
Has anyone tried this? Does it work? I'm a bit nervous because of the warning. Would be nice to know WHY he was banned. | Has anyone tried this? Does it work? I'm a bit nervous because of the warning. Would be nice to know WHY he was banned. | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 9 August 2008
Pokemon Ranch thoughts
Before I do this I wanted some professional advice. In My Pokemon Ranch it takes 999 Pokemon to get a Mew. 999 Pkmn is nucking futs. SO I was thinking about using Save Extractor to rip the save- Take my Pokemon back, Delete the save, and install the ripped save. In theory- all my pokemon I HAD stored, should still be there, and can re-upload the ones on my DS. Double my farm. Will this work? --Sin 02:37, 9 August 2008 (CEST)
Has anyone tried this? Does it work? I'm a bit nervous because of the warning. Would be nice to know WHY he was banned.
- It works. He was banned because he released software designed to be used for VC piracy, and we here hate piracy. Muzer 18:16, 18 June 2008 (CEST)
- LMAO, designed for VC. The TP exploit is used for piracy too, and the HBC is used to launch the WAD Manager. It all depends on the use that the end-user gives to these tools, not the author, isn't it? --PaRaDoX 19:20, 18 June 2008 (CEST)
- No, he made the tool to dump VC games. Not only opening the door to piracy, but also exposing a bug that the Wii devs were going to use for a downgrader. http://hackmii.com/2008/04/thanks-waninkoko/#more-7 . Also, you are hardly law abiding yourself, using Rayman code in your banners is illegal, K?
- We are not discussing if what I do is legal or not(ONLY the first banner was based on Rayman, others aren't). I use his tool to extract system files, not VC games. As I've said before, it all depends on what the end-user does with the tools, and it is not the authors fault. No one blames Twiizers for making the Zelda exploit, which brought us all this VC/WiiWare piracy. --PaRaDoX 02:36, 19 June 2008 (CEST)
- Me too? Actually I extracted the credentials from the NAND FS dumper and used them with wiifuse. I would have no way to fully access my Wii otherwise. Now, I don't know why Wanikoko made NAND FS, but I'll bet most of the people who object to it are the people who already had it beforehand. --Comex 23:18, 18 June 2008 (CEST)
- The main reason they didn't like him has nothing to do with piracy. Is because the NAND dumper exploited essentially a "root access" bug, as mentioned above, that the Twiizer guys were wanting to keep quiet about until they needed it. That pissed some people off. The word "Banned" is a little strong. We just don't support piracy here and waninkoko is no longer getting help directly from marcan et. al. --ProdigySim 23:52, 18 June 2008 (CEST)
- No, he made the tool to dump VC games. Not only opening the door to piracy, but also exposing a bug that the Wii devs were going to use for a downgrader. http://hackmii.com/2008/04/thanks-waninkoko/#more-7 . Also, you are hardly law abiding yourself, using Rayman code in your banners is illegal, K?
- LMAO, designed for VC. The TP exploit is used for piracy too, and the HBC is used to launch the WAD Manager. It all depends on the use that the end-user gives to these tools, not the author, isn't it? --PaRaDoX 19:20, 18 June 2008 (CEST)
- Unless he does what he did with svpe, ie ask for help under a disguise (that's how wad manager has USB MSD) Muzer 23:59, 18 June 2008 (CEST)
Children!
I'm removing the scary text from the article unless someone can name a specific reason that this program is more dangerous than most other programs. Ad-hominem attacks have no place here. Bushing 03:58, 19 June 2008 (CEST)