Talk:List of homebrew emulators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Public Domain ROMs Inquiry |
→Suggestion to make this page easier to read: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Public Domain ROMs? == | == Public Domain ROMs? == | ||
Okay, last time I read, Homebrew is AGAINST PIRACY. Especially using their software to use illegal ROMs. So I think we need to express that HB emulators are ''intended'' to be used with public domain ROMs. We could also use some links to PD-ROMs sites. (And recommended PD-ROMs.) Just throwing it out there. --[[User:Cyndaquil|Cyndaquil]] 03:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | Okay, last time I read, Homebrew is AGAINST PIRACY. Especially using their software to use illegal ROMs. So I think we need to express that HB emulators are ''intended'' to be used with public domain ROMs. We could also use some links to PD-ROMs sites. (And recommended PD-ROMs.) Just throwing it out there. --[[User:Cyndaquil|Cyndaquil]] 03:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Suggestion to make this page easier to read == | |||
Do you think that we should, instead of having a column in the tables for Description, change it to something like System Emulated? This would make it easier because they all say *name of system* Emulator, and the emulator part is redundant. --[[User:Bdr9|Bdr9]] 19:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:47, 26 December 2008
Public Domain ROMs?
Okay, last time I read, Homebrew is AGAINST PIRACY. Especially using their software to use illegal ROMs. So I think we need to express that HB emulators are intended to be used with public domain ROMs. We could also use some links to PD-ROMs sites. (And recommended PD-ROMs.) Just throwing it out there. --Cyndaquil 03:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion to make this page easier to read
Do you think that we should, instead of having a column in the tables for Description, change it to something like System Emulated? This would make it easier because they all say *name of system* Emulator, and the emulator part is redundant. --Bdr9 19:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)