Talk:Send ShellExtension: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: I think that this is not really a shell extension. I am quite sure that shell extensions need to be implemented in a dll.--~~~~ |
ProdigySim (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think that this is not really a shell extension. I am quite sure that shell extensions need to be implemented in a dll.--[[User:Henke37|henke37]] 13:10, 3 June 2008 (PDT) | I think that this is not really a shell extension. I am quite sure that shell extensions need to be implemented in a dll.--[[User:Henke37|henke37]] 13:10, 3 June 2008 (PDT) | ||
:Well what would you call it then? It extends the functionality of the shell for a certain file type. The only difference is it uses built-in registry based menu topology instead of loading something else to do more complicated things. It WORKS, doesn't it? [[User:ProdigySim|ProdigySim]] 14:18, 3 June 2008 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:18, 3 June 2008
I think that this is not really a shell extension. I am quite sure that shell extensions need to be implemented in a dll.--henke37 13:10, 3 June 2008 (PDT)
- Well what would you call it then? It extends the functionality of the shell for a certain file type. The only difference is it uses built-in registry based menu topology instead of loading something else to do more complicated things. It WORKS, doesn't it? ProdigySim 14:18, 3 June 2008 (PDT)